Uncategorized
Happy Holidays
The American Way of Hiring Is Making Long-Term Unemployment Worse
Disturbing. Read at your own risk.
Bad Government Software
Why is so much software so bad? There are lots of reasons. Writing good software is hard to begin with.* Big, custom projects are unique by definition, so they are sold as promises, not as finished products. Every vendor promises the same thing, so the one who promises to do it at the lowest cost often wins; when the project turns out late, bad, and over budget, too many executives have too much invested in its success to admit defeat. Consulting firms, which bill by the hour, make money by staffing projects with lots of people at relatively low cost, which is absolutely the wrong way to develop software; the productivity differentials in software are so vast that you can often get ten times as much output (of quality software) for less than twice the price, while a bad developer will do more harm than good to a project.
By James Kwak
Ezra Klein, one of the biggest supporters of Obamacare the statute, has already called the launch of Obamacare a “disaster,” and it looks like things are now getting worse: as people are actually able to buy insurance, the data being passed to health insurers are riddled with errors (something Klein anticipated), in effect requiring applications to be verified over the phone. Bad software is one of my bloggingsidelights, so I wanted to find out who built this particular example, and I found Farhad Manjoo’s WSJ column, which fingered CGI, a big old IT consulting firm (meaning that they do big, custom, software development projects, mainly for big companies). (See here for more on CGI.)
CGI was a distant competitor of my old company. I don’t recall facing them head-to-head in any deals (although my memory could be failing me), but they claimed…
View original post 629 more words
How “Dilbert” Practically Wrote Itself
Dilbert now acknowledged as a management expert by the Harvard Business Review!
Meet the New Face of Diversity: The “Slacker” Millennial Guy
The 24/7 work ethic was a bad idea to begin with.
The Harshest Generation
Drucker …explained in his 1968 book, The Age of Discontinuity, that education creates higher expectations without any guarantee of higher productive capacity. People want more pay; they want a career; and they want “knowledge work.” But there is no guarantee that the job market will continue to need or pay well for what they have to offer.
Were such a situation to unfold, Drucker warned, it would result in “an unemployed and unemployable intellectual proletariat the like of which the world has never seen.”
Are we there yet?
WHAT MAKES A MASTER WRITER?
The other side of passion. Must read!
Consultants Should All Get Real Jobs
Amen.
Revenge of the HourlyNerds
Disruptive indeed!

You must be logged in to post a comment.